When I first set out to join the Japanese social media network Mixi and document that experience, I was operating based on assumptions and opinions that I’ve come to question after having en…
… Mixi had suddenly transformed overnight in my perception from unassuming Facebook clone to something completely different.
With this quick Prezi presentation, I wanted to further explore the week’s topic of ‘remix culture’ by exploring a few cases that represent different outcomes of the complicated legal minefield of claiming copyright. In it I present a case which never saw any returns for the original creator, a case which successfully saw the creator receive recognition and recompense for its illegal use in profitable projects, and an ongoing case of an actor suing for his likeness decades after it was remixed and re-purposed by a famous show. Clearly, the remix culture’s repercussions on its founding contributors are varied and difficult to ascertain why exactly some are viable claims of infringement or not. Nevertheless, as Axel Bruns says in his study ‘Distributed Creativity: Filesharing and Produsage’, technological advances mean these remixes ‘need no longer take place in isolation’ and the internet particularly highlights the legal dubiousness of these remixing practices.
Click on this link to jump to the Prezi: https://prezi.com/vmdydgetr5rf/remix-culture/